|
Mar 09
2010
|
SMF community under siegePosted by Marius van Rijnsoever in Untagged |
|
Joomla has been working very hard as a community to work together and engage with each other to make Joomla a better product. Open Source Matters (OSM) the not for profit organisation that manages Joomla, has also been making a lot of progress in beng more transparent and asking for community involvement. You can read more about this on the following website:
http://www.alltogetherasawhole.org/
An example of how not to manage a community can be found at SMF (a free forum software that jfusion also integrated with Joomla). SMF differs from Joomla in that a commercial company owns the SMF software and that no code changes are allowed by others unless the SMF manager approves this. Joomla on the other hand is GPL software that allows modification by anyone without explicit permission. This was requiring JFusion to make lost of work-arounds to ensure the SMF license was respected (the previous official SMF-Joomla bridge was withdrawn because of license issues).
There has been a recent public fall-out between the SMF owner and SMF team members / developers. A letter from 30 SMF developers / team mebers (both current and former) asked the the manager of SMF to stand down and allow for a not-for-profit organisation to be created for SMF. You can read the blog post by one of the original SMF developers
http://www.lewisonline.ca/?p=426
The SMF manager that was appointed by original SMF developers, refused to step down and create a not-for-profit organisation. Instead she banned the team members that spoke up and refused to sign a new team agreement not to speak up publicity about the issue.
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=362862.msg2486763#msg2486763
The sad thing is that the original developers of SMF are not even allowed to make changes to the code or fork the project, as the code is "owned" by the commercial company. There has been some displeasure with SMF in recent times with slow development cycle (SMF 2.0 has been under development for 4 years), known security holes in the 2.0 RC where left unfixed for months (luckily for us Joomla can fix and release within hours) and some speculation about the manager taking a salary from the SMF funds. This latest controversy does not help the SMF community and is likely to further drive people appart. The best solution is probably for the current SMF manager to step down and create a neutral board to manage SMF, with a better software license. The current manager has spend a lot of time and effort on SMF, but the current controversy is undoing some of her hard work. But just like with children, if you want what is best for them you have got to let them continue in the big wide world without you keeping a tight leesh on them. Hopefully a fresh breeze in the SMF structure will allow healing of the community and allow this great forum software to blossum again.
Also see the discussion on the allogetherasawhole.org site:
http://www.alltogetherasawhole.org/profiles/blogs/smf-community-under-siege Thanks, Marius
http://www.alltogetherasawhole.org/
An example of how not to manage a community can be found at SMF (a free forum software that jfusion also integrated with Joomla). SMF differs from Joomla in that a commercial company owns the SMF software and that no code changes are allowed by others unless the SMF manager approves this. Joomla on the other hand is GPL software that allows modification by anyone without explicit permission. This was requiring JFusion to make lost of work-arounds to ensure the SMF license was respected (the previous official SMF-Joomla bridge was withdrawn because of license issues).
There has been a recent public fall-out between the SMF owner and SMF team members / developers. A letter from 30 SMF developers / team mebers (both current and former) asked the the manager of SMF to stand down and allow for a not-for-profit organisation to be created for SMF. You can read the blog post by one of the original SMF developers
http://www.lewisonline.ca/?p=426
The SMF manager that was appointed by original SMF developers, refused to step down and create a not-for-profit organisation. Instead she banned the team members that spoke up and refused to sign a new team agreement not to speak up publicity about the issue.
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=362862.msg2486763#msg2486763
The sad thing is that the original developers of SMF are not even allowed to make changes to the code or fork the project, as the code is "owned" by the commercial company. There has been some displeasure with SMF in recent times with slow development cycle (SMF 2.0 has been under development for 4 years), known security holes in the 2.0 RC where left unfixed for months (luckily for us Joomla can fix and release within hours) and some speculation about the manager taking a salary from the SMF funds. This latest controversy does not help the SMF community and is likely to further drive people appart. The best solution is probably for the current SMF manager to step down and create a neutral board to manage SMF, with a better software license. The current manager has spend a lot of time and effort on SMF, but the current controversy is undoing some of her hard work. But just like with children, if you want what is best for them you have got to let them continue in the big wide world without you keeping a tight leesh on them. Hopefully a fresh breeze in the SMF structure will allow healing of the community and allow this great forum software to blossum again.
Also see the discussion on the allogetherasawhole.org site:
http://www.alltogetherasawhole.org/profiles/blogs/smf-community-under-siege Thanks, Marius



